Research Statement

This project visualises the experience of being ethnically one, but linguistically another. Coined as an ethnic-linguistic dissonance, the research centers language and its scripts as the interconnecting element in culture, investigating hybrid experiences through bi-directional trans-scripting, focusing on both the Chinese and Latin scripts.

Through positioning one's self-perception of identity as a framework coined as an 'identity-literacy', it bridges the sense-making of cultural positioning to typographic mis-recognition and re-recognition, forming hybridised scripts that appear familiar, yet out-of-place. The research demonstrates how deeply-integrated language is to cultural sense-making, positioning what is deemed as dissonant into a celebrated site of co-existence through the hybridisation of scripts. See the study of several precedents below.

Study of Precedents

huruf Type Collective 2020
poster observations

huruf: Kedai-Kedai Merdeka: A Typographic Creolization. huruf, Medium, 2020, https://medium.com/@huruf.my/kedai-kedai-merdeka-a-typographic-creolization-2ffe19913024.



Designed with the spirit of Malaysia being freed from colonial rule, the inflections of elements from non-Latin scripts into Latin reflect the cultural and linguistic hybridity present in Malaysia’s linguistic landscape. Kedai-Kedai Merdeka visualises the nation’s blend of cultures, encapsulating new ways of presenting co-existence through attempting typographic creolisation that is Arabicised, Tamilisised, and Sinicised into a single poster.

Elements of the Chinese script and its character strokes can be observed through a few details, such as the vertical curved hooked stroke (竖弯钩) present in the large ‘Kedai-Kedai’ header, the use of vertical reading flows across both edges of the poster, followed by the use of modular compositions of Chinese characters towards the bottom.

The main distinguishing factor of the Sinicised attempt in the poster lies in its modular composition. However, only the words ‘alphabet’ and ‘alien’ contain proper use of trans-scripting, whereas ‘familiar’ and ‘common’ do not fit into any of the basic Chinese character compositions.

Xu Bing Chinese Artist and Calligrapher 1994
xubing-1 xubing-2

Xu Bing: An Introduction to Square Word Calligraphy. Xu Bing, Reeds, 1994, https://rdc.reed.edu/c/artbooks/home/bing-square-calligraphy.



Bing developed a blended species of script that resemble Chinese characters in Square Word Calligraphy, but actually consists of English words. Through injecting the Latin script into Chinese compositions, Bing introduced new perceptions of cultural norms, stretching notions of the audience’s perception of language. As a master calligrapher, Bing was able to blend both scripts together, forming mixtures of uppercase and lowercase letterforms constructed with the nuance of calligraphic strokes that fit into the Chinese character composition.

Rather than solely allowing the audience to interpret the characters on their own, Square Word Calligraphy was later on extended to the use of a textbook, an instructional video, and practice sheets to emulate classroom settings. Hence, the audience is not only given a guide to help with interpreting the characters, but are also capable of learning its constructioin into a square composition.

Among all precedents, Bing's inquiry resonated the most with what I intended to express. However, there were limitations with regards to how this relates back to the designer/scripter. This opened opportunities to not only trans-script bi-directionally, but to also inject an autoethnographic perspective to this inquiry through digital means, producing outcomes that represent personal limitations faced with the Chinese language.

Mariko Takagi German-Japanese Typographer 2013
takagi-1 takagi-2

Takagi: Hanzi-Graphy: A Typographic Translation between Latin Letters and Chinese Characters. Takagi, Academia Edu, 2013, https://www.academia.edu/12132299.



In Hanzi-Graphy, Takagi aimed to demystify general perceptions that Hanzi characters are incomprehensible and complex, breaking down its components into what Takagi coins as ‘micro-typography’. This breaks down the Chinese character into its smaller parts such as the example above, elaborated with English typographic terminologies to demonstrate how they represent more than just pictograms. 

Where Takagi’s research stands in contrast to Bing’s lies in the detailed technicalities of her knowledge in digital bilingual typeface design, whereas Bing’s takes on discursive, artistic modes of expression with a focus on calligraphy. Though Hanzi-Graphy doesn’t directly practice trans-scripting, it strongly interplays between the harmonious relationship of both the Latin-Chinese type/character compositions through the lens of extensive type knowledge, bridging binaries of language that are commonly perceived as opposed.

Bing and Takagi's research combined assisted in spearheading personal trans-scripting attempts, focusing on minute typographic details between both scripts. Through rigorous practice, I later developed my own bi-directional system that was successful across both script's hybridisation, merging systemic detail with personal cultural expression.